Institutional Development Committee

 

Minutes for February 17, 2005

 

Present:  B. Larson, D. Pierce, I. Rossell.

Guests:  R. Chess, G. Hardy, A. Gravely, B. Spellman.

 

IDC met in the Red Oak Room from 3:15 – 4:45 P.M.

 

I.  The first agenda item was an Intent to Plan a B.A. in Religious Studies.  Dr. Spellman reviewed the proposed major.  UNCA currently has a Religion minor that is housed in the Philosophy Department, although many courses are taught outside of Philosophy.  Dr. Larson asked about the difference between a “Religion” major and a “Religious Studies” major.  The difference is that Religion majors are typically offered at church-based institutions, while Religious Studies majors are typically offered at secular institutions.  Dr. Spellman said that one of the main challenges will be staffing the major.  A task force examined the feasibility of a Religious Studies major at UNCA, and recommended five faculty members.  Dr. Spellman said that a minimum of three faculty would probably be needed for the major to succeed.  However, the Position Allocation Committee will decide how many faculty positions are allocated to this major, and any new hires will likely be made incrementally.  Dr. Pierce asked if the task force had considered a joint Philosophy/Religious Studies program.  Dr. Spellman said that the task force did consider a joint program, but decided it was not the best way to proceed, because faculty in those two areas typically receive very different training.  Dr. Pierce wondered where Religious Studies majors would come from, particularly if UNCA limits its enrollment in the near future.  There was some discussion about the effects that a Religion major might have on enrollment in the Philosophy Department, and in the IST Program.  There was some discussion about where the new major would be housed (physically).   It seems that the most likely scenario is for the first few faculty hires to be housed in other departments.   Dr. Spellman indicated that there is little expectation of start-up funding for this major.  During the conversation on start-up funds, Dr. Gravely mentioned that the Multimedia major was granted start-up funds by OP.  There was some discussion about where resources for the new major would come from.  In the short term, enrollment increase money might be available, but if the university limits enrollment, then there might have to be a re-allocation of resources from other departments and programs.  Dr. Rossell thanked the visitors, and IDC members voted unanimously to approve the Intent to Plan, which will now go before the Senate for consideration.

 

II.  Dr. Rossell reported that John Stevens had contacted her about submitting a Request to Establish a UNCA Center, on behalf of the Environmental Quality Institute. The EQI has been operating on the UNCA campus for years, and is seeking formal status as a UNCA Center.  Given the troubling issues that have arisen recently as proposals to establish UNCA Centers have been submitted to IDC (such as space requests and requests for release time), and given that there is still no formal UNCA Policy for establishing Centers at UNCA, the committee unanimously decided that they would not receive any further documents to create Centers at UNCA, until UNCA has a formal Policy in place.  Dr. Rossell said that she would take this up with Dr. Padilla and Dr. Stevens.

 

III.  The committee discussed the revised wording of Section 8 of the Request to Establish a Human Rights Center at UNCA, which was submitted to Dr. Rossell by John Stevens.  The revision clarifies the wording that was disputed at the February 10, 2005 Senate meeting, and which led Dr. Rossell to withdraw the proposal from the Senate floor.  The revision removes the sentence in dispute from Section 8 (“Funding for one quarter release time for an Assistant Director will also be needed.”).  The committee voted unanimously to accept this revision to the Request to Establish a Human Rights Center.  The revised document will be resubmitted to the Senate.  Dr. Rossell will ask the Senate to waive the Comer Rule, so that the Senate can vote during its March 3 meeting.